From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You CAN choose the gender of your baby
Over 93% of Couples who followed our program
Conceived a child of the gender they chose!
Discover how you and your partner can learn the simple and effective
science behind the system and have the family YOU want.
It's 100% natural, it's safe and it's Proven!
|
There is a reason for everything. The 50/50 percent
statistic of giving birth to one gender or the other is not
random. Once the reasons behind this natural section
are understood, you can start changing them in your favor.
Your specific body may already have a tendency towards one
gender and if you don't take action, your next baby's
gender could already be set for you.
I know how confusing this can be, it took me a while to really
sort all the facts and methods (which sometimes have nothing to
do with each other).
It doesn't matter, if this is your first pregnancy or fourth,
getting pregnant itself can be difficult and may take a few
months. I know this is far from what they told us in high
school, but we were probably also more fertile when we were all
18…
In fact, in the real world, it takes the average fertile
couple 5-6 months to conceive. That is, without even
trying for a certain gender. When you are trying to be more
specific, and maybe limiting the times and dates of intercourse,
it may take even longer. Some couples, who may actually have no
fertility problems, may get frustrated after a while and of
course the frustration will only make things worst..
I am in no way trying to discourage you or anyone from having
children and / or choosing their gender, but I find it better to
make you aware of all possible outcomes (or lack off)
beforehand, and not make it sound like excuses after the matter.
With this realistic approach, I believe that overall health,
fertility and spirit of both parents-to-be are an essential part
of conceiving and selecting the gender of the baby.
This is the one of the goals of "The Baby Gender Choice
– The ultimate guide".
This is also why I am giving away the "His & Hers
Fertility Handbook" - to try and give a head start to
any couple TTC (trying to conceive).You have probably heard
of the Shettles Method, the Ericcson Method and Dr Jonas
method, and probably a few more.
There are probably more questions then answers that you are
concerned with after all this, sometimes conflicting
information.
|
|
"The Baby Gender Choice – The ultimate guide"
This book is first and foremost a practical guide.
The system I developed looks at all the factors that determine
the gender, and one by one manipulates them to one direction or
the other.
The operative words here are "all the factors".
The system, when followed, will address all of them,
systematically.
When all the factors are taken into account and all the needed
actions are followed, nature will take its course and sway in
the direction you set it to.
This process is like a "tuning" your bodies will go through, to
naturally choose the gender you want.
You are naturally giving one gender an unfair advantage.
|
|
"The Baby Gender Choice – The ultimate guide"
is basically a tool to let YOU transform your life.
When you use this tool, you will be able to enjoy the
benefits and the outcome. |
|
This article is about the selection of the sex of offspring.
For the evolutionary concept, see
sexual selection.
Parents frequently prefer their offspring to be of a
particular sex for a variety of reasons. Social sex selection
or
human sex selection is the attempt to control the sex
of the offspring to achieve a desired sex. It can be
accomplished in several ways, both pre- and post-implantation of
an
embryo, as well as at
birth. It has been marketed under the title family
balancing.
[edit]
Preference for sex of child
In some cultures, male offspring are desired in order to
inherit property, carry on family name, to provide support for
parents in old age.
Studies have demonstrated that having sisters, as compared to
brothers, can enhance the quality of life of an adult.[1]
[edit]
Scientific methods
[edit]
Pre-implantation methods
Two major types of pre-implantation methods can be used for
social sex selection.
Sperm sorting - The separation of X
Chromosome sperm from Y Chromosome sperm. The resulting
sorted sperm are used in either
artificial insemination or
in-vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures.
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) - In sex selection
cases, embryos resulting from IVF procedures are genetically
tested for X or Y Chromosomes. The embryos of the desired sex
are then implanted.
[edit]
Post-implantation methods
Prenatal diagnosis -
Amniocentesis and/or
ultrasound is used to determine sex of an offspring, leading
to subsequent
abortion of any offspring of the unwanted sex. The more
recent technique of fetal blood now makes it possible to test
the sex of the fetus from the sixth week of pregnancy.
[edit]
Post-birth methods
Sex-selective
infanticide - Killing children of the unwanted sex. Though
illegal in most parts of the world, it is still practiced.
Sex-selective
child abandonment - Abandoning children of the unwanted sex.
Though illegal in most parts of the world, it is still
practiced.
Sex-selective
adoption - Placing children of the unwanted sex up for
adoption. Less commonly viewed as a method of social sex
selection, adoption affords families that have a gender
preference a legal means of choosing offspring of a particular
sex.
[edit]
Ethical concerns
The application of these techniques to humans creates moral
and ethical concerns in the opinion of some, while the
advantages of sensible use of selected technologies is favored
by others.
Listed here are some ethical concerns:
Sexual discrimination - The idea that if one sex is
preferred over another, those individuals in the non-preferred
sex would be at a disadvantage. Opponents of social sex
selection argue that the procedure would artificially unequalize
the ratio of females to males, leading to discrimination,
potential violence and abuse of the smaller group.
Eugenics - Many fear that PGD, in general, is a 'slippery
slope' leading to a society where 'non-selected' individuals
would be discriminated against. PGD is used primarily in the
U.S. for the purpose of reducing
birth defects and abnormalities, but opponents fear that
there is nothing stopping persons from using PGD for more
eugenic-based purposes. It has been noticed that the largest
gender imbalances in China come from the
Han Chinese ethnic group.[1]
Psychological Implications - There may be psychological
implications for both the parents and child if the procedure
does not produce a child of the desired sex. Furthermore,
problems may also arise if the gender-related expectations of
the parents are not subsequently fulfilled by the child.
However, it may be the case that any child will fail to fulfill
particular parental expectations, so perhaps more emphasis
should be placed on promoting acceptance and tolerance within
parents as opposed to completely banning sex selection.
Conflict with
Kantian principles - Many argue that by selecting the sex of
their child, parents are using the child as a means of
fulfilling their own desires rather than respecting the child as
a person and an end in their own right.
In contrast, there is widespread support for the concept that
individual reproductive choice is an important private decision
which should not be infringed by government. There is
considerable evidence from sperm sorting in the United States
that pre-conceptual use of this technology, which does not
involve destruction of embryos or fetuses, is desired and
utilized by many couples to achieve balancing of gender ratios
within their families. Furthermore, the fear that there would be
preferential selection of boys is clearly false - indeed, actual
experience in the U.S. indicates that the technology is used
more often to obtain girls than boys. Thus the real-world
experiences with techniques such as MicroSort demonstrate that
theoretical fears of gender discrimination from sperm sorting
are not at all realized in a country such as the U.S. There is
equally little real evidence in support of the other theoretical
harms postulated by opponents of pre-conceptual gender
selection.
Post-conceptual selection by preimplantation testing (PGD) is
a distinct subject as it obviously involves preferential use of
embryos, and of course termination of pregnancy for gender
selection is a quite different matter.
[edit]
Demographic concerns
In addition to the ethical concerns mentioned, issues of
demographics arise in societies where social sex selection
is common. A society may exhibit a widespread bias towards
having children of a specific gender, either due to cultural
biases or economic concerns (e.g. male children may be more
employable in the future and thus provide more financial
support). When combined with frequent social sex selection, this
bias may produce a
gender imbalance that has undesirable consequences. This
phenomenon has been observed in many nations in the
Far East, such as
India
and
China, where social sex selection has produced unnaturally
high male/female ratios in the population. China's gender
imbalance is further increased by the
One Child Policy. In these nations, a lack of opportunity
for many men to marry is believed to be producing increases in
crime,
demand for
prostitution, and the selling of brides.[2][3]
Major demographic changes have occurred in China because of
sex selection. Chinese government reports show that the
sex ratio for newborns is 118:100 (boys:girls), higher in
rural areas such as
Guangdong and
Hainan (130:100) compared to the average of 104:107 in
developed countries. It is believed that the ratio would
increase further to the point that, by 2020, men of marriageable
age would be unable to find mates, resulting in large social
problems.[2][3]
In contrast, actual experience in Western cultures provides
no evidence for any degree of gender imbalance from technologies
which have long been available and legal - such as selective
abortion or preimplantation embryo testing. When used for family
balancing indications in such countries as the United States,
pre-conceptual sex selection is widely sought without any
preferential selection of males. Thus the right of individual
families to determine whether or not to balance gender of
offspring in their families is not and will not become, in many
countries, a demographic issue. Furthermore, in countries where
such demographic issues exist because of strong gender
preferences in a segment of the population, regulatory and legal
control of, without denial of access to, sperm sorting
technology can be utilized to provide individuals with choices
while ensuring that equal numbers of boys and girls are produced
for population demographic equality.
[edit]
History and folk beliefs
There are a wide variety of social sex selections methods
which have not been demonstrated to be effective. Because even
implausible and ineffective methods have a "success" rate of
50%, many continued to be recommended by word of mouth.
As early as 330 BC,
Aristotle prescribed the ligation (tying off) of the left
testicle in men wishing to have boys.[4]
Some people believe that timing
conception according to
astrological charts can influence a baby's sex,[5]
though there is no evidence to support this or any other timing
method. A 13th century Chinese
conception chart purports to be able to identify the sex of
the baby before birth.
During the 1980s, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories
teamed with the United States Department of Agriculture to
develop the first (and only) successful and repeatable means of
separating X- (female) and Y- (male) chromosome bearing
spermatozoa.[6]
Recently, a study published in 2006 indicated that mothers
with
toxoplasmosis have a significantly higher
sex ratio of boys to girls. This has been discussed in
connection with the
manipulation hypothesis of parasites.[7]
Another study found a link between sex and the diet of the
mother, but this may be due to statistical chance, and has yet
to be confirmed.[8]
[edit]
Legality
Sex selection is officially prohibited in
China,
but the Chinese government admits that the practice is
widespread, especially in rural areas of China and among lawless
groups such as
ghettoized migrant workers in cities (despite denials by the
government-sponsored studies)
[4][5]
Social sex selection is illegal in
India.
To ensure this, prenatal determination of sex through
ultrasound is also illegal in India. These laws are
instituted to combat the prevalent practice of
sex-selective abortion. However, these laws have generally
failed to be effective in rural areas and, despite education
efforts, sex-selective abortion continues to be widely practised
there.
Sex selection is legal in most of the world, and it's
practiced particularly in Western countries, but is more limited
in Eastern countries, such as India or China. However, an
exception of this is Europe, where the practice of sex-selection
is prohibited (bar the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus).